Add 'Working from House: the Nice, the Bad and The Ugly'

Working-from-House%3A-the-Nice%2C-the-Bad-and-The-Ugly.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>It is reductive and simply incorrect to call working from house "a failed experiment", as Gene Marks does (The evidence is in: working from house is a failed experiment, 8 April). Marks refers to a current examine from Microsoft to support his point that we now have, actually,  [5 Step Formula](http://www.mindepoch.com:9092/guysalas661424) not enjoyed the liberty and adaptability of remote work. Nevertheless, the very knowledge that he refers to paints a unique picture. Marks makes his major point by referring to the fact that just about two-thirds of workers would like extra in-particular person time with their teams. This, nevertheless, doesn't prove that they want to return to the workplace full-time. Quite the opposite, the research exhibits that 70% of the workforce prefers a extra flexible approach of working sooner or later. Yet Marks dismisses this a part of the study, arguing that staff are shopping for into an "illusion of extra independence, flexibility and management over one’s life". This is not any illusion.<br>
+
+<br>We can no longer afford to listen to outdated-faculty business house owners twisting our phrases. We owe it to ourselves and future generations to battle for our proper to work remotely. If completed correctly, it could imply an exodus from costly cities, helping to unravel the housing crisis going through millennials